After today's Twitter discussions surrounding babel, concise methods, and a functions name property I had a thought and I was curious if it had been discussed before.
Is there a very good reason that the "name" property of a function is not a well known Symbol property? My understanding is it's main use is for debuggers anyway. It just seems like it would be more in line with the rest of the spec. I think it would be best to put more distance between the name property of a function and it's binding (if any) to reduce any potential confusion. Making it a symbol property and (also my opinion) making it writable would help in reducing said confusion. - Matthew Robb
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
