I guess we are just going to disagree here. Double bindings with mutability still seem clearly bad. I can't make sense of the rationale that classes can cope with every external binding being mutable except for, somehow, their own name, and we're doing users a favor by "protecting" them from "tampering" for just this one binding in this one place.
-j _______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
