For different objects this is the only way I see possible with
destructuring. IMO it's a bit ugly and weird to read deep destructuring:
```
let x = { a: 1 };
let y = { b: 2 };
let { x: { a }, y: { b } } = { x, y };
```
But I'd prefer Bob Myers's way:
```
let x = { a: 1 };
let y = { b: 2 };
{x.a, y.b}
```
Now that would be for destructuring. But isn't the following shorthand
property assignment not destructuring:
```
var c = {x,y};
//so I'm thinking Bob wants the following:
var c = {x.a, b.y}; // {a: 1, b: 2}
```
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 3:51 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. <[email protected]>
wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 9:44 AM, Bob Myers <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Apologies if something like this has already been proposed.
> >
> > We have simplified object literal syntax:
> >
> > {a, b}
> >
> > However, I often find myself writing this:
> >
> > {a: x.a, b: y.b}
> >
> > Would it be possible to have a syntax such as
> >
> > {x.a, y.b}
> >
> > Where the property name is taken from the last segment of the property
> > reference, so that `x.a` becomes the value of property `a`?
>
> If you're taking both values from the *same* object, we have the syntax:
>
> {a, b} = x;
>
> This may or may not help you.
>
> ~TJ
> _______________________________________________
> es-discuss mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
>
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
