On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 3:59 AM, Andrea Giammarchi <andrea.giammar...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 to Kyle proposal, using eval or Function is not even an option in CSP > constrained environments ( unless the relative code is provided as SHA256, > then we need to agree on how such code should look like and share it as > polyfill ) > > I'd also suggest `Reflect.isValidSyntax` as alternative to > `Reflect.supports` 'cause it's less misleading when it comes to figure out > APIs support and their implementation. > > After all, that's exactly what we'd like to know, if a generic syntax will > break or not.
CSS has an exactly analogous feature already, and calls it CSS.supports(). That's a decent reason to stick with supports() as the name. ~TJ _______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list es-discuss@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
