I don't think it's good to think of the value sent with `done: true` as "one of 
the values." It's in a different category, and not part of the yielded sequence.
________________________________
From: Mark Volkmann<mailto:[email protected]>
Sent: ‎2015-‎04-‎05 18:43
To: Allen Wirfs-Brock<mailto:[email protected]>
Cc: es-discuss list<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: Re: last value from iterator

Thanks, that helps. I had been thinking that for-of was a model for how 
iterators should be consumed.

When implementing any kind of iterator (generator or not), it seems important 
to recognize that if you choose to return a value with done set to true, you 
are precluding the use of for-of with that iterator (assuming you want all the 
values).

On Sun, Apr 5, 2015 at 11:40 AM, Allen Wirfs-Brock 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

On Apr 5, 2015, at 6:04 AM, Mark Volkmann wrote:

I thought that when an iterator returns done: true, the value should not be 
used.

Why do you think that?  The definition of the IteratorResult interface in the 
the ES6 spec. doesn't say that.

However, if a generator function ends by returning a value, done will be true 
when that value is returned and the value should be used.

Could be used.  Whether a generator or any Iterator provides a meaningful value 
when it reach the the 'done' state depends upon its specific definition.

Given this, how can a consumer know the correct way to handle the value when 
done is true? Clearly consumers shouldn't have to be aware of whether the 
iterator is actually a generator and whether it ends by returning a value.

An Iterator does not have to be a generator to provide a 'done' state value.  
In general, If you are going to do anything other than basic iteration, such as 
is performed by for-of, you need to know about the specific Iterator you are 
using.

Allen





--
R. Mark Volkmann
Object Computing, Inc.
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss

Reply via email to