On 7 April 2015 at 18:33, Christoph Pojer <[email protected]> wrote:
> it doesn't have to be a bug. It asserts that if a is not > null/undefined, it must have a property b. This can be enforced > through static typing. Under option 1, that's not what it does. Since it's equivalent to `(a?.b).c`, if a is null/undefined, it will always raise an error, so it's more or less the same as just doing `a.b.c`.
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
