On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 3:35 PM, Michael Dyck <jmd...@ibiblio.org> wrote: > I'm interested.
OK, thanks. I'll get back to you next week. Unfortunately I'm not around today. >> Each time a new revision is published, some manual steps are required >> to map broken links to the right sections in the new document. > > Do you mean that old 'es6-draft.html' URLs should resolve to the > corresponding section in the HTML version of the latest ES7+ draft? (In > which case, the latter would need to continue to support (remap) all the old > section-ids.) I wonder if people would find that surprising. I hadn't considered it. Given the use cases I know about (mostly es-discuss and in implementations' bug-tracking databases), I think it's better to do it the other way, so that ES6-era links continue to point to an ES6 spec. Starting from scratch will not save a whole lot of work, though. The work required with each revision is mostly figuring out how to redirect section-ids that were newly changed in that revision, not maintaining the old redirects (which is at most some search-and-replace). -j _______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list es-discuss@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
