Thank you.
 
I just post my new understanding a few seconds earlier. Hope that's right. :)

> On Apr 17, 2015, at 11:28 PM, Andreas Rossberg <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> On 17 April 2015 at 17:18, Glen Huang <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> Not sure about others, but i assume the condition part and statement part in 
> a control construct live in the same scope.
> 
> That's why you can do `for (let a = 1; a < 2; a++) a;`. And `if (let a = 1) 
> a;` maybe in es7?
> 
> Why that's not the case for "do while"? Is my mental model wrong?
> 
> Yes. :)
> 
> for (let x ...) scopes over the body naturally. In your example, you expect 
> to scope an inner declaration (one even inside a block) to scope to the 
> outside. That is something else entirely, and makes no sense to me.
> 
> /Andreas
> 
> 
> > On Apr 17, 2015, at 11:10 PM, Caitlin Potter <[email protected] 
> > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> >
> > Is there a language where lexically scoped variables declared in a block 
> > are accessible outside of that block? Java, C, C#, rust, Python, etc, will 
> > not let you do this. I’m not sure this is a gotcha for most software 
> > developers
> >
> >> On Apr 17, 2015, at 10:57 AM, Glen Huang <[email protected] 
> >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> >>
> >> ```js
> >> do {
> >> let a = 1;
> >> } while (a);
> >> ```
> >> is "a" undefined in the while condition? This seems like a gotcha.
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> es-discuss mailing list
> >> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> >> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss 
> >> <https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss>
> >
> 
> _______________________________________________
> es-discuss mailing list
> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss 
> <https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss>
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss

Reply via email to