As Perlis has said: too much syntactic sugar causes cancer of the semicolon. IMO, this is not much of a win given what is now available, especially with arrow functions and shorthand method definitions
On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 1:37 PM, Alexander Jones <[email protected]> wrote: > Propose adding support for > > let function foo() {}; > > which would have the equivalence of: > > let foo = function foo() {}; > > The idea is to support the normal scoping of let, but without forcing you > to repeat yourself when naming the function, whilst still having the > function's name property be set. > > This would trivially extend to const and var. Also, possibly class. > > Thanks > > > _______________________________________________ > es-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss > >
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
