> Le 18 mai 2015 à 23:53, Jason Orendorff <[email protected]> a écrit : > > On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 1:51 PM, Claude Pache <[email protected]> wrote: >> Another more powerful approach (which I prefer), [...] > > As long as we prohibit matching groups within lookbehind assertions, I > think the approach you prefer is a strict superset of what's proposed. > So there's no opportunity cost to taking the proposal as-is: the .NET > semantics could be compatibly added later. > > I imagine TC39 gives some preference to proposals that exist in a > concrete form. So if you prefer the .NET approach enough to do > anything about it, now's a great time to write some spec text. > >> That said, I think there are easier missing features to be added, that are >> supported by most other RegExp flavours. I'm thinking of: >> >> * the `s`, or `.dotall` flag: the dot `.` matches every character, including >> newlines; >> * true support of Unicode, namely: escape sequences such as `\Lu` for >> uppercase letter, or `\X` for grapheme cluster. > > Why not submit proposals for these? >
You are right, but procrastination and other activities... But I'll try to write some more concrete proposals for those ideas. —Claude _______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
