Edwin Reynoso wrote:
Yes please edit it, you don't have to repost. BTW the only thing I can agree with is the `Object.is()` which to me seems like the only problem it solves is `Object.is(NaN, NaN)` now returns true
You didn't agree with the root post (whose sender has had the "mod" flag set for moderated postings, btw). That root post ignored compatibility constraints that have been discussed to death over the years, and just glibly asserted that == and === could be changed. So, I don't believe you agreed with that noise. Am I mistaken?
If your point is that Object.is does not pull its weight, make a stronger case for why people should have to write it by hand.
You missed that Object.is(-0, +0) (and with arguments transposed) is false, while -0 === +0.
/be _______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
