Some comments:
> { p1 as x, p2 } # o // { x: o.p1, p2: o.p2 }
Not sure why the `as` syntax since we already have `x : p1 ` syntax from
destructuring.
> p # if o
This is really complicated syntax, especially given `if` is not an
expression.
> { a, b } @ [ 1, 2 ] // { a: 1, b: 2 }
A second operator seems even more overkill
> propname* # o
Yet more syntax.
> { a, b } ##
And another operator.
All and all I'm strongly against adding so much syntax complexity to
something like this, if the bind (`::`) proposal gets in you can do this
sort of thing with a simple function and get as-nice syntax.
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
