> On Jun 22, 2015, at 12:51 PM, C. Scott Ananian <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> It's not too surprising: it's the same reason why the ES6 spec was just
> published *on paper*, with the html version being explicitly flagged as
> non-normative.
>
>
Actually the above is not correct. Both the HTML and PDF renderings are
generated from the same normative source document. Both rendering are
considered normative by Ecma International.
What the HtML version <http://ecma-international.org/ecma-262/6.0/> says is:
"The PDF version is the definitive specification. Any discrepancies between
this HTML rendering and the PDF rendering are unintentional."
That text is there be make it clear how disputes should be resolved in anybody
thinks the two rendering disagree on any point. They don’, but just in case
somebody wants to start a fight we have predetermined the outcome.
Allen
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
