> (I don't think any such es-discuss replacement should be on webplatform.org, FWIW -- that crosses the W3C and Ecma streams.)
Is that such an issue? I was thinking the larger exposure and closer working would be a bigger benefit than the mail management options. On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 9:10 PM Brendan Eich <[email protected]> wrote: > Let's talk about this at July's TC39 meeting. Maybe we can have best of > both worlds, thanks to Discourse. (I don't think any such es-discuss > replacement should be on webplatform.org, FWIW -- that crosses the W3C > and Ecma streams.) > > Having two es-dis{cuss,course} list-like things is not great. I hardly > ever look at es-discourse.com, although I've known about it for a while. > Does it lead to action with TC39 independent of what's raised here on > [email protected], or directly at meetings by Ecma members? > > /be > > Jordan Harband wrote: > > http://es-discourse.com already exists as an alternative place to > > discuss things if one doesn't wish to email this list. It may be worth > > exploring using that more fully before asking TC39 to consider an > > alternative to their existing mailing list. > _______________________________________________ > es-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss >
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
