Thanks for the clarification. On Sun, Jul 12, 2015 at 5:05 PM, Luke Scott <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Jul 12, 2015, at 2:48 AM, Benjamin Gruenbaum <[email protected]> > wrote: > > I think my original post might have been confusing so allow me to > clarify. > > I'm not suggesting to add named parameters to the language, I did not > intend to start a discussion about named parameters' merits vs passing an > object literal (I thing Axel had a blog about that a while ago). > > What I'm interested in is *where the **is **TC standing in this regard*. > > - Are there any proposals currently under work (TC's GitHub suggests > no)? > - Were there proposals in the past that were rejected or abandoned? > - Was there discussion about named parameters in the language before? > > Since I sent the original email I've found > https://github.com/lukescott/es-named-arguments which isn't a proposal > yet but looks pretty new, so I'll just cc Luke and see if he can update us > all (although it looks like his proposal ties it to type hints) :) > > > At the moment my focus has been on type hints, although I've been rather > busy at work. I have a few tasks to finish on that :). > > The named parameters example is one rational why a space should be used > for type hints instead of a colon. I had brought up named parameters on the > list at some point and some people suggested destructuring instead. > Personally I'd rather be able to name parameters without creating an > object. > > The status of the repo is it's currently a concept. > > Luke >
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
