>This is pretty ingenious. If I thought this was a real problem that needed solving
I'm not sure how I should interpret this. But I'm pretty sure you also need the current index of array in a for loop. Since I can access the index and value directly in `.forEach(value, index, array)`, why isn't there a for-loop-statement/control-flow-statement for doing the same thing? And yes I heard it can be solved with different methods. We can go on discuss different way to loop through an array, recursive functions, while-loops, iterators, generators, meta syntax etc. But they aren't clean solutions to a wildly popular problem. All these counter arguments. Can you explain why even `.forEach(value, index, array)` made the deal also? tis 14 juli 2015 kl 21:41 skrev Jonathan Bond-Caron <jbo...@gdesolutions.com >: > On Tue Jul 14 09:27 AM, Domenic Denicola wrote: > > From: es-discuss [mailto:es-discuss-boun...@mozilla.org] On Behalf Of > > Matthew > > Robb > > > > > Why not use the new meta syntax? > > > > If I thought this was a real problem that > > needed solving, > > Disagree > > "As early as the mid-1980’s, it was observed that programming > language research and funding emphasized technical aspects of the > domain and neglected psychological aspects:" > > " The human and computer parts of programming languages have developed in > radical asymmetry" > > http://repository.cmu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1805&context=isr > > Bias of Engineering problems > Psychology > >
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list es-discuss@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
