On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 10:29 AM, Allen Wirfs-Brock <[email protected]> wrote: [snip] > > I have to guess at your semantics, but what you are trying to express above > seems like something that can already be accomplished using the `reviver` > argument to JSON.parse. >
Yes and no. `reviver` achieves part of goal but but still assumes that parsing is fundamentally blocking and assumes that I want to return something and have that in-memory obj built up and returned. However, if what I want instead is to forgo the creation of an in memory model altogether and working simply from an incremental, async stream of events, then I'm out of luck. >> In other words: allowing for incremental access to the stream and fine >> grained control over the parsing process, rather than having to block >> while everything is parsed out, building up the in-memory object >> model, then being forced to walk that model in order to do anything >> interesting. >> >> Personally, I'm not overly concerned about the possibility of races. > > But, TC39 is concerned about races. > Granted ;-) ... there's a reason I prefixed that sentence with 'Personally' ;-) >> >> - James >> > _______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
