On Aug 11, 2015, at 10:26 AM, Michael Dyck wrote: > On 15-08-11 11:47 AM, Allen Wirfs-Brock wrote: >> >> On Aug 10, 2015, at 6:03 PM, Michael Dyck wrote: >> >>> While converting the HTML spec into ecmarkup, I found roughly 100 >>> glitches (depending on what and how you count), >> >> Have you checked them against http://ecma-international.org/ecma-262/6.0/ >> ? It would be useful to know how many I have already fixed and also >> additional things I missed. > > I just fetched what's currently at that URL, and it's identical to the > version that I've been working with. It looks like I got that on June 29, so > if you've fixed anything since then, I'm not seeing it for some reason.
No, that's still urrent. I mis-read your original post. I thought you had said that your were working against a HTML version you had generated using es-spec-html > > >>> but I'm disinclined to report them [...] >> >> We can make formatting corrections to >> http://ecma-international.org/ecma-262/6.0/ if there are significant >> deviations from the PDF. > > Ah, okay. In that case, I can see the use in reporting the glitches. > >> It isn't necessary to submit 100 bugzilla tickets. Any reason format of >> a list that can be checked against the document would be useful. If you >> want you can just send it to me and Brian. > > Right now, it's a sequence of pattern/replacement tweaks, with some > comments, so it'd take a bit of work to get it into a reasonable format. Anything that that leads to an approximate problem area would be helpful. Allen _______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
