On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 5:02 PM, Bradley Meck <[email protected]> wrote: > The timing and extensibility is too complex to easily fit into ECMA-262, see > some things mentioned in https://github.com/whatwg/loader/issues/54 . I vote > no for a few years at least.
I am not calling for importing the entire loader spec into ECMA-262. -j _______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
