Why not remove Headless Arrow Functions from ExpressionStatement like FunctionExpression and ObjectLiteral.
then statement like: var a = i => 1 will be var a = i => 1; instead of var a = i; => 1; BTW why Statement[return] exists? or why there is no Statment[break] or Statement[continue]? did I miss something? On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 4:39 AM, Brian Terlson <brian.terl...@microsoft.com> wrote: > Sure, this works for syntax questions. > > > > Today no expression can start with =>, but there is the headless arrows > proposal[1] which might add one. IIRC we wanted to be future compatible. > > > > I’m not sure what the motivation for [no LT here] in yield * was, but I > support it on the grounds that splitting yield and * across lines is bad :-P > In general better to be more conservative than less, I suppose. > > > > 1. https://bterlson.github.io/headless-arrows > > > > From: es-discuss [mailto:es-discuss-boun...@mozilla.org] On Behalf Of Eric > Suen > Sent: Wednesday, October 21, 2015 12:28 AM > To: es-discuss@mozilla.org > Subject: Why is no line break is needed in ArrowFunction? > > > > Try to write a parser for es6, is this the right place for question about > syntax? > > > > There is no expression or statement start with =>, same goes to yield [no > LineTerminator here] * AssignmentExpression ? > > > > > ------------------------------------------------ > Spket IDE - Development Tool for RIA. > > http://www.spket.com -- ------------------------------------------------ Spket IDE - Development Tool for RIA. http://www.spket.com _______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list es-discuss@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
