Doesn't necessarily seem like a bad idea. I could be on board with that.
> On Oct 22, 2015, at 6:18 PM, Mohsen Azimi <[email protected]> wrote: > > Pardon my lack of use of proper terminology. > > This is kind of annoying working with large template strings. When I leave an > interpolation placeholder(what's the right name?) empty it blows up all my > code. > > Can it be forgiving like Ruby and CoffeScript and just replace it with empty > string? > _______________________________________________ > es-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss _______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
