In your first example, the arrow function's "this" would be the "this" of the context the "class" is defined in - it wouldn't be bound at all. Can you point me to an example of where that example "bar" is a function bound to the instance?
On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 5:45 PM, JD Isaacks <[email protected]> wrote: > Considering the proposals for both concise methods and the bind operator I > think it would be a great addition to be able to use them together. > > I am already seeing a lot of this: > > class Foo { > bar = () => { > // bound > } > buz() { > // unbound > } > } > > > I think having the bind operator with a concise method makes things more > uniform: > > class Foo { > ::bar() { > // bound > } > buz() { > // unbound > } > } > > > This would also allow for this to be using on object literals: > > let foo = { > ::bar() { > // bound > } > buz() { > // unbound > } > } > > > This would also make using recursion with concise functions feasible: > > let fibonacci = { > ::at(n) { > if (n < 2) { > return n; > } > return this.at(n-1) + this.at(n-2); > } > } > fibonacci.at(7); // 13 > > > I am looking for a champion for this feature. Anybody interested? > > Thanks, > JD Isaacks > > _______________________________________________ > es-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss > >
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
