On Sun, Dec 6, 2015 at 10:48 PM, Andrea Giammarchi
<[email protected]> wrote:
> However, I'm curious to know about this "Functions that sometimes return
> promises and sometimes not are already known to be an antipattern" because I
> have a library that does that in somehow explicit way (if you pass a
> callback it doesn't return  a promise, it invokes such callback once
> resolved) and it works without any real-world problem.

This pattern is fine; different overloads of a function are basically
different functions, and we're using this pattern in the web platform
in a few places to "update" some CB-using APIs to Promises.  As long
as the function previously returned void and took the CB last, we can
do it.

~TJ
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss

Reply via email to