On 12/11/2015 06:13 PM, [email protected] wrote:
Hi, everyone. New guy here, sorry to pollute the mailing list. I was just wondering, can't the fat arrow operator be overloaded to include pipelines? The semantics are already very close -- in both cases it defines inputs and outputs -- and it would look similar to Golang's channel operator and Haskell's monadic >>= operator. Off the top of my head, I don't see any serious ambiguity. If a left-side function is invoked, the operator is treated as a pipeline; if not, it's an arrow function.Send es-discuss mailing list submissions to [email protected]To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to [email protected] You can reach the person managing the list at [email protected] When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of es-discuss digest..." Today's Topics: 1. Re: es-discuss Digest, Vol 106, Issue 30 (John Gardner) _______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
