Jordan AFAIK you can't have undefined const declaration so your concern is unfounded.
However, I'm pretty sure what Brendan says **is** indeed what developers want so I'd +1 that without problems. Regards On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 4:44 PM, Jordan Harband <[email protected]> wrote: > That seems hazardous - if someone is converting a "var" codebase to > "const" and "let", and they convert `var foo;` to `const foo;` expecting it > to be undefined, the current TDZ error will be much more helpful to them > than a silent change of meaning in their code to `const foo = 'foo';`. > > On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 8:35 AM, Kip Obenauf <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> A common pattern I see is this: >> const ADD_ALL_THE_STUFF = 'ADD_ALL_THE_STUFF' >> >> Would it be helpful to allow a shorter version of this to be: >> const ADD_ALL_THE_STUFF >> >> Rather than have that just be forever undefined, it could automatically >> refer to a string of the same name, i.e. 'ADD_ALL_THE_STUFF'. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> es-discuss mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > es-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss > >
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
