> Le 8 janv. 2016 à 16:28, Matthew Robb <[email protected]> a écrit :
>
> I'd still love to have symbol syntax using the @ident form or something. (I'm
> aware that it would likely conflict with the current decorators proposal).
>
>
What would be a concrete syntax? The following one seems nice:
```js
{
symbol @foo; // lexical declaration of symbol; roughly equivalent to:
const __foo__ = Symbol('foo');
a.@foo = b; // roughly equivalent to: a[__foo__] = b; where __foo__ is the
symbol @foo declared above.
}
```
However, it is just a little sugar for something perfectly doable in ES2015.
Personally, I prefer to keep the syntax complexity budget for truly new things
like private state: https://github.com/wycats/javascript-private-state
<https://github.com/wycats/javascript-private-state>
—Claude_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
