Yeah, sorry for the noise but this part confused me too > Please note that RegExp.$1 is not part of the spec
All good then, Regards. On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 3:53 PM, Yang Guo <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm not even sure why RegExp.$1 is mentioned here. The submatches can be > observed just fine as part of the match result. And I don't think it's a > "gotcha" if it's reflected in the spec. And it is in the current draft > afaict. > > Yang > > _______________________________________________ > es-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss > >
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
