No it does not compete with the string literal version (see my proposal, no quotes), its an identifier only. 3d-is-cool is not a valid identifier so couldn't work, neither would es6-shim.
On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 3:44 PM Jordan Harband <[email protected]> wrote: > also, would identifier would `import '3d-is-cool';` create? > > On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 12:43 PM, Jordan Harband <[email protected]> wrote: > >> That is currently valid syntax for a module that has no exports - ie, a >> module for which you're relying solely on side effects. One popular usage >> is `import 'es6-shim';` for example. >> >> On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 12:31 PM, Paul Tyng <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> I went through the archives and existing proposals, I didn't see one >>> similar to this. I apologize if its been covered before. I thought that >>> redundant import statements could be simplified with a shorthand that works >>> similar to object literal notation. >>> >>> import fs; >>> >>> vs >>> >>> import fs from 'fs'; >>> >>> https://github.com/paultyng/proposal-shorthand-import >>> >>> I would welcome any feedback. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Paul Tyng >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> es-discuss mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss >>> >>> >> >
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
