Well, try and define "natural" in the context of constructed languages. If this was a question of "naturalness" (whatever that may be), then really any deviation from what the language currently is, is "unnatural". Anyway, we're here to discuss, not to blindly judge. :)
Note that the parens serve no purpose whatsoever. They're actually just a relic dating back to Ken Thompson's re-interpretation of BCPL, B (1969), which in turn did this, because in FORTRAN, `if x` and `ifx` looked the same to the parser; the parens were thus needed for the parser to differentiate between the two. Since C derived from B, virtually any language that derived from it adapted to this redundant syntax; nowadays, the parens exist solely for decoration. [Douglas Crockford](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nlqv6NtBXcA) and [Brendan Eich](https://brendaneich.com/2010/11/paren-free/) seem to be in favor of making them optional; that's why the strawman exists. On Montag, 1. Februar 2016 15:47:52 CET Alican Çubukçuoğlu wrote: > Isn't this very unnatural? If you are into this kind of thing, why don't > you code Coffee for example? (Or don't since saving a few keystrokes isn't > worth your dignity.) >
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
