We'll get it on the next TC39 meeting's agenda. /be
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 5:28 PM Alan Johnson <[email protected]> wrote: > If this is done, please go with `async do { … await … }`. May as well > reuse existing syntax as much as possible. As mentioned, `<-` is > problematic both from the standpoint of conflict with existing operators > and incomplete analogy with Haskell. If the result should be Promise-ified, > best to indicate this explicitly with `async`. > > I do think that having a syntax for async expressions is very useful. > IIFEs already feels like a hack around the lack of expression-orientedness > of control flow structures in JS, and async-IIFEs just compound the issue > of syntactic noise for straightforward operations. > _______________________________________________ > es-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss >
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
