> On May 13, 2016, at 11:09 AM, Herby Vojčík <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Brian Barnes wrote: >> It could be, but there is a difference between: >> >> var x; >> >> and: >> >> this.x > > You should probably do `var x = XPool.get();` and at the end `XPool.put(x);` > and do `XPool`s for every possible X type which you want to not GC. And then > happily use local variable, as it should be. If things are not very parallel > / reentrant, the pools will likely only contains zero / single element.
I already do this, I was just showing possible problems with engines doing this without a hint. Right now if I have anything that’s an object that only lives within a function, I move it to the class constructor, no need for the extra additions of a pool. [>] Brian
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
