> Le 26 mai 2016 à 13:23, Mark S. Miller <[email protected]> a écrit :
> 
> 
> 
> On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 11:25 AM, Claude Pache <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> 
> > Le 26 mai 2016 à 10:43, G. Kay Lee <[email protected] 
> > <mailto:balancetraveller%[email protected]>> a écrit :
> >
> > I was under the impression that strict mode is a (temporary) workaround to 
> > get rid of unwanted bad parts of the language without instantly breaking 
> > anything. The long term question thus should be: do we have a timeline on 
> > the final removal of non-strict behavior from the language, and establish 
> > the "strict mode" as the one and only standard behavior. If so, then 
> > introducing any additional language feature to help detecting 
> > strict/non-strict is certainly not ideal.
> 
> AFAIK, there is no plan to remove non-strict mode.
> 
> And to be clear about my intentions, what I have in the back of my head was 
> certainly not "introducing any additional language feature to help detecting 
> strict/non-strict" (yuck!), but whether it makes sense to think about a 
> possible way to remove that leak from `Function#arguments` and 
> `Function#caller`. But it would be premature to consider that issue without 
> *at least* an answer to my original question: Are there other ways...?
> 
> Hi Claude, what do you mean by "remove that leak"? Hypothetically, let's say 
> you had such a test and that it was reliable. How would you use it remove the 
> leak? (This is probably also the best way to clarify what precisely you mean 
> by removing the leak.)

Maybe that "leak", namely observing whether a function is strict, is not 
something to care about.

But here is what I think to be a possible way to remove it: Because 
`Function#arguments` and `Function#caller` do return `null` for sloppy 
functions in some circumstances (namely, when the function is not found in the 
call stack), let them always return `null` for non-sloppy functions.

—Claude

_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss

Reply via email to