Didn't know that. Nice to know! :-) On Wed, Jun 15, 2016, 11:48 Allen Wirfs-Brock <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Jun 14, 2016, at 8:57 PM, Isiah Meadows <[email protected]> wrote: > > Just an educated guess (I'm not actually involved in any part of this > effort - just a random person subscribed to this list), but I think it's > because of ECMA itself. Granted, TC39 has already noted that this one > doesn't exactly fit well with the rest of their framework, because of the > constant and frequent input, and because the software industry moves a lot > faster than the hardware and electrical engineering industries (that's most > of what ECMA deals with). > > > Note that Ecma has a long history of developing software related > standards. In fact the second standard issued by Ecma was for a programming > language. > > http://www.ecma-international.org/publications/standards/Standardwithdrawn.htm > > >
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
