I believe Symbols are all actually non-enumerable which will void the suggestion. And please, stop trying to add all kinds of trivial variations of property extraction methods already. I also oppose the recently proposed Object.enumerableKeys and gang.
On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 9:25 AM, doodad-js Admin <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Well, a map is more often of dynamic size, mapping from one specific > type T to another specific type U. (Of course, either can be variants.) An > object is a bag of properties of fixed size, with keys of type > string|symbol, values of a type specific to the property, metadata from the > property descriptor, and a prototype chain. > > > > That’s exactly what I think of objects and Map. So back to > “Object.symbols” :) > > _______________________________________________ > es-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss > >
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
