A use case could be to dynamically name a class at runtime without `eval`.
`let o = { [name]() {} }` produces a named function inside of `o` (at least
in Chrome) without needing eval, and then we can extract it from the object.*/#!/*JoePea On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 7:48 PM, Blake Regalia <[email protected]> wrote: > What would be a use case for this? > > > - Blake > > On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 7:42 PM, Bergi <[email protected]> wrote: > >> /#!/JoePea wrote: >> >> Might be nice to be able to do it with classes too: >>> >>> ```js >>> let dynamicName = "foo" >>> let o = { >>> class [dynamicName] { /* ... */ } >>> } >>> console.log(o.foo) // logs the class >>> ``` >>> >> >> You can already do >> >> let dynamicNAme = "foo"; >> let o = { >> [dynamicName]: class { >> … >> } >> }; >> >> but I can see absolutely no reason why you'd want to put a class inside >> an object literal. >> >> Bergi >> >> _______________________________________________ >> es-discuss mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss >> > > > _______________________________________________ > es-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss > >
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
