Well, after looking at "Runtime Semantics: InstanceofOperator(O, C)" in the spec that you linked to, the mere fact that `@@hasInstance` can be undefined in which case inheritance is ignored completely goes against... inheritance.
So, this proves that we can make the spec be anything we wish it to be (as currently it doesn't follow pure prototypal inheritance), so we could easily choose to use `[[GetOwnProperty]]` without inheritance if we wanted to, and in my opinion that is much better. */#!/*JoePea On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 10:59 PM, Claude Pache <[email protected]> wrote: > ```js > Uncaught TypeError: Cannot read property 'call' of undefined > ``` > > > (...) > > > Also, reading the message of your TypeError, I wonder if Babel may also > fail unexpectedly in case SomeClass does not inherit the standard > `Function#call`, as in: ```class SomeClass { static call() { throw "Pwnd!" > } }```. > > > Correction: The potential issue I was thinking of, is when > `SomeClass[Symbol.hasInstance]` does not inherit the standard > `Function#call`: > > ```js > class SomeClass { > static [Symbol.hasInstance]() { /* foo */ } > } > SomeClass[Symbol.hasInstance].call = function () { throw "Pwnd!" } > ``` > > which is quite a corner case. > > —Claude > > >
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
