Ah, ok, a bit sad because all more scientific languages, and python too,
all math books, all will use `-e^3` for meaning `-(e^3)` (^ or **), because
it's just `-exp(3)` or `-pow(E, 3)`
and `(-1)^n` otherwise, when we want to take the signs with.
If you wanted to avoid any confusion you could have forbidden `2**2**3` too
because it's not obvious it's right associative
But ok, thanks for the explanation.
2016-10-14 14:05 GMT+02:00 Bergi <a.d.be...@web.de>:
> Cyril Auburtin schrieb:
>> I would expect `-2**3` to return -8, or `-2**2 == -4`, since it should be
>> like `-(2**3)`
> You would, others would not. -2 ** 2 clearly should return 4, shouldn't it?
> Is there a reason for this restriction? Python does it `-2**3` fine
> Because of the ambiguity it has been decided to make it a syntax error if
> the two operators are used together. If you want `-(2**3)`, you have to
> write it like that, and if you want `(-2)**3` you have to write it
> explicitly as well.
> See https://esdiscuss.org/topic/exponentiation-operator-precedence for
> the full discussion.
> - Bergi
> es-discuss mailing list
es-discuss mailing list