> Not sure if I'm missing something, but wouldn't it be trivial to code that
> constructor in JS?
Yes it would be trivial, but my design I came up with was an example. The point
I wanted to get across was to have some sort of standard practice for error
handling using `return` rather than `throw`, akin to how `Promise` gives us a
standard design and encapsulation for asynchronous code.
es-discuss mailing list