OMG sweet! I love it. then how it’ll be formed when mixed with labeled statement?
> 2016. 10. 30., 오후 3:15, Yongxu Ren <[email protected]> 작성: > > Yes, it does the exact same thing. > I think using = and operators is a bit cleaner than 'do'. > However, The biggest advantage for this feature is you can write functional > code without extra syntax. > Allowing block to return value will allow you to write concise code like in > ocaml Haskell or scala. > > On Sunday, October 30, 2016, Olivier Lalonde <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > Sounds like the "do expressions" proposal. > http://wiki.ecmascript.org/doku.php?id=strawman:do_expressions > <http://wiki.ecmascript.org/doku.php?id=strawman:do_expressions> > > On Sat, Oct 29, 2016 at 5:32 PM, Yongxu Ren <[email protected] > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> wrote: > potentially, this syntax can be extended to functions > ``` > function f() ={stat} > // is equivalent to > function f() {return stat} > > > let f = () => ={stat} > // are equivalent to > let f = () => stat > ``` > > it can also be applied to `try...catch`.... and more, such as > > ``` > // pattern matching > match(expr) { > pattern1:={ > //block > } > pattern2:={ > //block > } > pattern3:={ > //block > } > } > > _______________________________________________ > es-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');> > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss > <https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss> > > > > > -- > - Oli > > Oli Lalonde > http://www.syskall.com <http://www.syskall.com/> <-- connect with me! > _______________________________________________ > es-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
