lol thanks, good call. too much habit typing "const" :-p s/const/let there
On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 10:39 AM, Andrea Giammarchi < [email protected]> wrote: > FWIW: got bitten from same thing too ... the fact `for(const x of ...)` > works would always mislead me to think a `for(const i; ... i++)` would too, > even if it's completely different meaning/issue/matter. > > Oh well > > On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 5:34 PM, Mathias Bynens <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 6:24 PM, Jordan Harband <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Here you go: >> > >> > 1) `function* range(start, end) { for (const i = +start; i < end; ++i) { >> > yield i; } }` >> >> For future reference: `++i` throws when `i` is a `const` binding. The >> intended example uses `let` instead. >> _______________________________________________ >> es-discuss mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss >> > >
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
