Okay...I may have misremembered the general reason (I thought I saw perf concerns stated somewhere, but I can't remember precisely where), but I've yet to see anything significant in the open about why they were so against it. That's why I'm asking what drove them against it. -----
Isiah Meadows [email protected] On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 8:24 PM, Domenic Denicola <[email protected]> wrote: > Why do you say "regarding performance"? That seems made up with no evidence. > > > ________________________________ > From: Isiah Meadows <[email protected]> > Sent: Jan 5, 2017 20:09 > To: [email protected] > Subject: Cancel Token proposal withdrawl > > The [latest proposal][1] has been withdrawn due to [Google > resistance][2] regarding performance. What concerns did they have, and > with what parts? It's hard to figure out what the problem is and come > up with ideas when it's all smoke and mirrors. And yes, I've tried > searching for any traces of an answer, but I've found pretty much > none, using multiple search engines. > > Please, could I get some sort of idea what is actually wrong with the > proposal, what's driving them to be so strongly against it? :-( > > [1]: https://github.com/tc39/proposal-cancelable-promises > [2]: > https://github.com/tc39/proposal-cancelable-promises/issues/70#issuecomment-267414933 > > ----- > > Isiah Meadows > [email protected] > _______________________________________________ > es-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss _______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
