The initial proposal for discussion is below:
https://github.com/sirisian/ecmascript-static-constructor I don't believe this conflicts with other proposals yet, nor any future proposals. Essentially it adds static members in a very compact syntax with minimal grammar changes required. What I foresee happening years from now is public, private, and static member syntax will be added. Much like how public members are defined in the constructor for the moment the static constructor would be the way to define static members of the class for now. Thoughts? _______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
