I understand, but you can also ternary within a ternary so why would this have different capabilities ?
On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 7:12 PM, T.J. Crowder < [email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 7:06 PM, Andrea Giammarchi < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Interesting. Would it play well nested too? >> >> ```js >> if (x === 2 || (x === 3 && y === 1)); >> >> // as >> >> if (x === (|| 2, (&& 3, y === 1))) >> ``` >> > > > ? >> > > :-) I think at that point we're just creating an alternate expression > syntax for JavaScript, which we probably want to avoid... Having the > operands be Expression productions should be sufficient (which wouldn't > allow that kind of nesting). > > -- T.J. >
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
