Isiah I think there is a lot of value in the work you have done here. I think it would be useful to see this broken down in a way that makes solving the Promise cases in a way that would be forward compatible with Observers front and center. Right now it feels optimistically speculative because the approach is treating Promise and Observable as equal edges to the problem which may be true but today we have under facilitated Promise abstractions and no one is feeling any pain/loss around missing Observable support (yet).
Does any of that make sense? - Matthew Robb On Sun, Mar 5, 2017 at 8:24 AM, Isiah Meadows <[email protected]> wrote: > See: https://gist.github.com/isiahmeadows/ba298c7de6bbf1c36448f718be6a762b > > TL;DR: I've created a proposal to enable modelling of parallelism and > non-linear control flow, to interoperate with the non-determinism of > Promises and Observables. I drew inspiration from non-von Neumann > paradigms in creating the primitive operations. I'm seeking feedback > for potential improvements and just overall feelings on the idea. > > Obviously, this is blocked on the Observable proposal [1] getting > completed, and may need edited accordingly. And I've already proposed > a similar thing [2] in their repo, but not quite to this scale. > > [1]: https://github.com/tc39/proposal-observable > [2]: https://github.com/tc39/proposal-observable/issues/141 > > ----- > > Isiah Meadows > [email protected] > _______________________________________________ > es-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss >
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
