Tagged Template literals exist: < https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Template_literals#Tagged_template_literals >
On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 2:03 PM, kdex <[email protected]> wrote: > … which I would be very happy to discuss, nonetheless. > It's indeed a little painful to work with derived built-ins if you can't > use > literals. > > Could we maybe have a syntax that, for its current block, declares how to > interpret literals? Maybe something along the lines of: > > ```js > class MyArray extends Array {}; > Array as MyArray; > const array = [1, 2, 3]; > assert(array instanceof MyArray); > ``` > > On Wednesday, July 5, 2017 8:47:53 PM CEST kdex wrote: > > Overriding literals with a derived class is an entirely different > problem. > > :) > > On Wednesday, July 5, 2017 8:42:39 PM CEST Boris Cherny wrote: > > > I tried that approach, but it doesn’t work when creating objects via > > > literal notation ([], {}). A bit clumsy to have to write “new > > > Array(1,2,3)", or “Array(1,2,3)” every time. > > > _______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing > list > > > [email protected] > > > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss > > _______________________________________________ > es-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss > >
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
