-1
as far as i'm concerned, const is a wart with surprising behavior that
should have never been introduced. best leave the wart as is rather than
add more surprises.
On Jul 8, 2017 3:09 PM, "Raul-Sebastian Mihăilă" <raul.miha...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> I'd like to propose the following syntax:
>
> ```js
> const obj = {
> x:| 3, // non-writable property with value 3
> y:] 4, // non-configurable property with value 4
> z:} 5 // non-writable non-configurable property with value 5
> };
> ```
>
> Perhaps class fields could also use this syntax. Maybe decorators can take
> care of this but should you really need to use a decorator for something so
> basic?
>
> _______________________________________________
> es-discuss mailing list
> es-discuss@mozilla.org
> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
>
>
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
es-discuss@mozilla.org
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
