@Eli you are correct, my mistake. I have not heard of the pipeline operator proposal before, I use a similar syntax in Elixir and enjoy it thoroughly.
On Jul 16, 2017 7:14 PM, "Oriol _" <[email protected]> wrote: > I don't see the point in this `tap`. The `myReverse` example can be > written as > > ```js > const value = myReverse([1, 2, 3].map(String)).map(num => num * 2); > ``` > > If you don't want to write `myReverse` at the beginning, you might like > the pipeline proposal: https://github.com/gilbert/es-pipeline-operator > I think it would be something like > > ```js > const value = [1, 2, 3] > .map(String) > |> myReverse > |> arr => arr.map(num => num * 2); > ``` > > And similarly for the `console.log` example: > > ```js > [1, 2, 3] > .map(num => num * 2) > |> arr => { console.log(arr); return arr; } > |> arr => arr.reduce((a, b) => a + b); > ``` > > --Oriol > > > _______________________________________________ > es-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss > >
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
