On Tue, 8 Aug 2017 at 03:25 Jordan Harband <[email protected]> wrote:
> Entries are an established pattern. Relitigating it isn't going to be > useful. Something like this would only make sense if it accepted either an > iterable of entries, or an array of entries (which is strictly less useful > than taking an iterable) - no other input value would make sense to me. > > They are established as a feature in the language. I am not trying to relitigate that. I'm simply saying that when transitioning from a typical iterable to an object we shouldn't be forced into it as an intermediary, besides which that doesn't offer any advantage over the reduce mentioned earlier in this thread, and even has worse performance. The [key, value] pattern was originally introduced for Maps to allow objects as keys, which isn't even valid in an object, besides the pattern not being a tight structure in of itself.
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
