On Sat, Aug 26, 2017 at 3:07 AM, Jordan Harband <[email protected]> wrote: > > "incompatible" is a very strong and likely incorrect claim. `(sync1 |> sync2 |> async1).then(x => x |> sync3 |> async2).then(x => async3)` could work just fine.
Or indeed, a robust proposal might allow for async functions in the pipeline (with some indication, so you can look at the code and reason about it; although `then` accepts non-thenable values and you can't tell by looking, so...). Conceptually: ```js let x = sync1 |> sync2 |*> async1 |> sync3 |*> async2 |*> async3; ``` -- T.J. Crowder
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
