Well, there's already .map(), .find() and .filter() for returning values from arrays
-- Michael J. Ryan - [email protected] - http://tracker1.info Please excuse grammar errors and typos, as this message was sent from my phone. On Aug 28, 2017 12:30 PM, "Sebastian Malton" <[email protected]> wrote: > I have seen some people want to modify some of the array prototype > functions, especially forEach, so that returning from them returns a value. > However, I have also seems that this could break things since in some > cases, again forEach, the return value in explicitly defined. > > Thus I propose the new syntax `super return` and any other positive number > of supers. This syntax is currently not valid in any scenario and with the > current meaning of super seems, to me at least, relativity easy to > understand. > > The outcome of this basically means "return from current context up one > level and then return from there". > > A current method of doing this is by using try / catch but it is not > ideal. Using the above method I believe that it would be able to be better > optimized. > > > _______________________________________________ > es-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss > >
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
